While there is such a thing as correctness in ethics, in interpretation, in mathematics, the way to understand that is not by trying to model it on the ways in which we get things right in physics.

The physicist who states a law of nature with the aid of a mathematical formula is abstracting a real feature of a real material world, even if he has to speak of numbers, vectors, tensors, state-functions, or whatever to make the abstraction.

I can only please one person per day. Today isn't your day, tomorrow doesn't look good either.

... causes (pains) are not logical constructions out of their effects (behaviour).

No sane person should believe that something is subjective merely because it cannot be settled beyond controversy.

While there is such a thing as correctness in ethics, in interpretation, in mathematics, the way to understand that is not by trying to model it on the ways in which we get things right in physics.

Cut the pie any way you like, "meanings" just ain't in the head!