As a partner in a firm full of women who work outside of the home as well as stay at home mothers, all with plenty of children, gender equality is not a talking point for me. It is an issue I live every day.

Working moms, stay-at-home moms, they're both extremely hard jobs.

This is a business built on promotion. We've been giving music away to radio stations for 30 years.

The Constitution wanted artists to have control over their works because they knew it would create incentive to create more works. That is clearly still the goal.

For music, unlike a $500 software program, people are paying a buck or two a song, and it's those dollars and pennies that have to add up to pay for not just the cost of that song, but the investment in the next song.

Music has an intrinsic value that touches Americans - they love their music, and want more.

Napster is essentially using the music to make money for themselves and that's the part that's both morally and legally wrong. That I think is more relevant than whether or not I'm losing money.