We must look at alternatives objectively, and not try to fit the future into our present social mould.

Very few people can communicate with one another. The only language that's not subject to interpretation is mathematics, chemistry, basic science, engineering principles, and applied agriculture. But other than that, many systems today are subject to interpretation.

The way we use technology is completely wasteful. We duplicate many vacuum cleaners, tools; In the future we will make the best of equipment and make it available to everyone.

If our system continues without modification involving environmental and social concern, we will face an economic and social break down.

Merely complaining without proposing an alternative offers nothing.

The difference between a serial killer and a saint is environment. That's a very hard thing to accept because that raises a lot of questions

If there's a group like Amish people, that want to live their own lifestyle – they don't want to live in our city – they want to live out in the country, with their own projects. We’ll put up the buildings for them, design the buildings for them, design the food production systems for them – if they want us to. But we don’t control them.