All sentences of the type 'deconstruction is X' or 'deconstruction is not X', a priori miss the point, which is to say that they are at least false. As you know, one of the principal things at stake in what is called in my texts 'deconstruction', is precisely the delimiting of ontology and above all of the third-person present indicative: S is P.

I do not believe in pure idioms. I think there is naturally a desire, for whoever speaks or writes, to sign in an idiomatic, irreplaceable manner.

Actually, when I write, there is a feeling of necessity, of something that is stronger than myself that demands that I must write as I write.

I do everything I think possible or acceptable to escape from this trap.

The circle of the return to birth can only remain open, but this is a chance, a sign of life, and a wound.

Whatever precautions you take so the photograph will look like this or that, there comes a moment when the photograph surprises you. It is the other's gaze that wins out and decides.

I’m no good for anything except taking the world apart and putting it together again (and I manage the latter less and less frequently).