I do everything I think possible or acceptable to escape from this trap.

I do everything I think possible or acceptable to escape from this trap.

But can one not conceive of a presence, and of a presence to itself of the subject before speech or signs, a presence to itself of the subject in a silent and intuitive consciousness? Such a question therefore presupposes that, prior to the sign, and outside it, excluding any trace and any différance, something like consciousness is possible.

The blindness that opens the eye is not the one that darkens vision. Tears and not sight are the essence of the eye.

I do not believe in pure idioms. I think there is naturally a desire, for whoever speaks or writes, to sign in an idiomatic, irreplaceable manner.

If things were simple, word would have gotten around.

The circle of the return to birth can only remain open, but this is a chance, a sign of life, and a wound.