No Kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave.

....there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people.

No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion.

If you would not have affliction visit you twice, listen at once to what it teaches.

All lawful authority, legislative, and executive, originates from the people.

If a favour is asked of you, grant it if you can. If not, refuse it in such a manner as that one denial may be sufficient.

In prosperity prepare for a change; in adversity hope for one.