If the "rich" were swarming into poor neighborhoods and beating the poor until they coughed up the dimes they swallowed for safekeeping, yes, this would be a transfer of income from the poor to the rich. But allowing taxpayers to keep more of their money does not qualify as taking it from the poor - unless you believe that the poor have a moral claim to the money other people earn.
James LileksIโll feel that horrible feeling in my stomach you get when youโve gone over to the Dark Side. But Iโll be fine. Thatโs the good thing about the Dark Side. Eventually, your eyes adjust.
James LileksThe not-quite-sort-of lie works here too - often an ad will announce that "Congressman Johnson voted for a bill that gave tax breaks to companies like Enron." True - although the bill allowed all companies to accelerate depreciation of copying machines. Yes, Enron benefited, but Enron also benefited from the revolution of the Earth around the sun. Hardly an argument to freeze the planet in one spot.
James LileksI don't believe in the very concept of "first thing in the morning." I'm a "third thing in the afternoon" fellow.
James Lileks