But everyone cannot be there, and that is why photographers go there - to show them, to reach out and grab them and make them stop what they are doing and pay attention to what is going on - to create pictures powerful enough to overcome the diluting effects of the mass media and shake people out of their indifference - to protest and by the strength of that protest to make others protest.

Starvation and disease are the original weapons of mass destruction. When you burn fields and kill animals, people are left vulnerable.

Photojournalists know the horrors of war can only be exposed at close range. Kodak Film.

If there is something occurring that is so bad that it could be considered a crime against humanity, it has to be transmitted with anguish, with pain, and create an impact in people - upset them, shake them up, wake them out of their everyday routine.

[Photography] puts a human face on issues which, from afar, can appear abstract or ideological or monumental in their global impact.

I used to call myself a war photographer. Now I consider myself as an antiwar photographer.

The greatest statesmen, philosophers, humanitarians ... have not been able to put an end to war. Why place that demand on photography?