My question is about the head of the Office of Government Ethics. Is he acting ethically when he sent out nine tweets praising Donald Trump saying that his plan was brilliant. How did he come to that conclusion? And how does come to his current conclusions having never done an investigation and never looked at the paperwork in the point where he can actually come to a reasonable conclusion?I think that's unethical.

I mean Donald Trump is a legitimate president. He won fair and square. He didn't win the election because of Russian interference.

Governor Romney has paid 100 percent of his taxes that are owed. He has complied 100 percent with what the law requires.

If you're uncertain and a [Donald] Trump skeptic, you think you know what, this administration is going to be better than I expected.

Incredible how unnecessary it [questions the legitimacy of President-elect Donald Trump] was, because John Lewis was articulating something that most Democrats simply aren't, calling Trump illegitimate.

If you saw General [James] Mattis and General [John] Kelly and Senator [Jeff] Sessions and Mr.[Rex] Tillerson and Congressman [Mike] Pompeo testify, you thought, look, this is a reasonable more than a reasonable, I would say, cabinet.

Federal spending is atrocious.