Everybody is of course free to interpret the work in his own way. I think seeing a picture is one thing and interpreting it is another.

Cubism is an anatomical chart of a way of seeing external objects. But I want to confuse the meaning of the act of looking.

A picture ought to be looked at the same way you look at a radiator.

It's simple, you just take something and do something to it, and then do something else to it. Keep doing this, and pretty soon you've got something.

A-not-complete-unit, or a new unit. The elements in the 3 parts should neither fit nor not fit together. One would like not to be led. Avoid the idea of a puzzle which could be solved. Remove the signs of "thought." It is not "thought" which needs showing.

Take an object. Do something to it. Do something else to it.

I have no ideas about what the paintings imply about the world. I don't think that's a painter's business. He just paints paintings without a conscious reason.