It may be that everything the life science companies are telling us will turn out to be right, and there's no problem here whatsoever. That defies logic.

Now in Wikipedia it's really interesting. If you put something incorrect up on Wikipedia within minutes there are people crawling all over that sentence saying, "This is wrong" or "I want to change this" or "You've got to include an amplification," et cetera. So there's this massive checks and balances that actually makes that accuracy work. This is the kind of model that we - and I'm not sure why no one's discussing this - that we now have to begin to apply to fake news.

We are learning that the earth functions like an invisible organism. We are the various cells of one living being. Those who work to save the earth are its antibodies.

Being both entrepreneurial and social is no longer an oxymoron, but rather a tautology.

It seems disingenuous for the intellectual elite of the first world to dwell on the subject of too many babies being born in the second- and third-world nations while virtually ignoring the over-population of cattle and the realities of a food chain that robs the poor of sustenance to feed the rich a steady diet of grain-fed meat.

So my attorneys brought litigation in the U.S. federal courts. The judge ruled in our favor.

One thing I've learned over these last 30 or 40 years is that people make history. There's no fait accompli to any of this.