I'm a big advocate of freedom: freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of thought.

Frankly, and let me be blunt, Wikipedia as a readable product is not for us. It's for them. It's for that girl in Africa who can save the lives of hundreds of thousands of people around her, but only if she's empowered with the knowledge to do so.

I'm not real good at the administrative part of running a company.

You shouldn't use anything as the sole source for anything, in my view.

If I had some information, the last thing I would ever do with it is send it to Wikileaks.

Simply having rules does not change the things that people want to do. You have to change incentive.

The Supreme Court has held that code is speech. And it doesn't matter that it's done on a computer or done face to face or done in a newspaper, reporting the facts of the world is protected speech.