I need there to be documentary photographers, because my work is meta-documentary; it is a commentary about the documentary use of photography.

Photography mirrored the [nineteenth century] will towards rigor, towards defining details, the need for miniscule description, the long-distance optics, for technology at the service of truth, for concepts of credibility, of objectivity, the need to archive, for the consolidation of institutions like the museum, in short, towards a need to control memory.

Among photojournalists there is still a sense that doing a photomontage is far graver than adding a filter. I am against this type of hierarchy that demonizes some options over others, demonizes them in respect to, what - ideology or moral code?

I have always thought that the photographer does artistic work and that art consists of working with fictional premises.

I need there to be documentary photographers, because my work is meta-documentary; it is a commentary about the documentary use of photography.

Photography... has lived under the tyranny of its subject matter: the object has exercised an almost total domination.

There are religions in which the representation of the world is banned as an usurpation of the power of a God, creator of all things. It is very possible that photography is a trick of the devil and each shot is a sin.