We need do no more than repeat: only under communism does the individual become himself and lead his own life.

Among all mental diseases that have been systematically inoculated into the human cranium, the religious pest is the most abominable.

Is anarchism possible? The failure of attempts to attain freedom does not mean the cause is lost.

'God' - as revealed in his book of edicts and narratives is practically an idiot. He has nothing to say that any sensible person should want to listen to.

As set forth by theologians, the idea of 'God' is an argument that assumes its own conclusions, and proves nothing.

He who negates present society, and seeks social conditions based on the sharing of property, is a revolutionary whether he calls himself an anarchist or a communist.

Is anarchism desirable? Well, who does not seek freedom? What man, unless willing to declare himself in bondage, would care to call any control agreeable? Think about it!