I think without a doubt, that what is called "financial genius" is merely a rising market.

World War II revealed two of the enduring features of the Keynesian Revolution. One was the moral difference between spending for welfare and spending for war. During the Depression very modest outlays for the unemployed seemed socially debilitating, economically unsound. Now expenditures many times greater for weapons and soldiers were perfectly safe. It's a difference that still persists.

In the world of minor lunacy the behaviour of both the utterly rational and the totally insane seems equally odd.

Smoking dope and hanging up Che's picture is no more a commitment than drinking milk and collecting postage stamps. A revolution in consciousness is an empty high without a revolution in the distribution of power.

Where humor is concerned there are no standards - no one can say what is good or bad, although you can be sure that everyone will.

In the market economy the price that is offered is counted upon to produce the result that is sought.

All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door.