There are people who believe in an absolutely transparent prose; with every respect for clarity of expression, I don't.

We're all living on borrowed time. The trick is to come up with works of sufficient interest to pay off the debt.

Sometimes the reader will decide something else than the author's intent; this is certainly true of attempts to empirically decipher reality.

I'm very happy that the New York Times has spoken well of my stuff; who wouldn't be? But it's not a choice I made.

Creating the fictional background for a game world isn't significantly different from creating a background for fiction.

There are readers who want every point to be clearly and unambiguously set forth, and there are those who want to pry ideas and meanings out for themselves.

The language fictional characters use is chosen for effect, at least if the author is concentrating.