[E]ach person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others.

I'm concerned about the survival, historically, of constitutional democracy.

Intuitionism is not constructive, perfectionism is unacceptable.

The intolerant can be viewed as free-riders, as persons who seek the advantages of just institutions while not doing their share to uphold them.

[E]ach person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others.

The question is, we have a particular problem. How many religions are there in the United States? How are they going to get on together? One way, which has been the usual way historically, is to fight it out, as in France in the sixteenth century. That's a possibility.

Peace surely is a good reason, yes. But there are other reasons too.