An intuitionist conception of justice is, one might say, but half a conception.

People can make arguments from the Bible if they want to. But I want them to see that they should also give arguments that all reasonable citizens might agree to.

In all sectors of society there should be roughly equal prospects of culture and achievement for everyone similarly motivated and endowed. The expectations of those with the same abilities and aspirations should not be affected by their social class.

The fundamental criterion for judging any procedure is the justice of its likely results.

The fault of the utilitarian doctrine is that it mistakes impersonality for impartiality.

The extreme nature of dominant-end views is often concealed by the vagueness and ambiguity of the end proposed.

Thus I assume that to each according to his threat advantage is not a conception of justice.