A society regulated by a public sense of justice is inherently stable.

Justice is happiness according to virtue.

An intolerant sect has no right to complain when it is denied an equal liberty... A person's right to complain is limited to principles he acknowledges himself.

Ideally a just constitution would be a just procedure arranged to insure a just outcome.

The question is, we have a particular problem. How many religions are there in the United States? How are they going to get on together? One way, which has been the usual way historically, is to fight it out, as in France in the sixteenth century. That's a possibility.

The extreme nature of dominant-end views is often concealed by the vagueness and ambiguity of the end proposed.

There are infinitely many variations of the initial situation and therefore no doubt indefinitely many theorems of moral geometry.