Ideally a just constitution would be a just procedure arranged to insure a just outcome.

Public reason arguments can be good or bad just like other arguments.

The naturally advantaged are not to gain merely because they are more gifted, but only to cover the costs of training and education and for using their endowments in ways that help the less fortunate as well.

[E]ach person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others.

The fault of the utilitarian doctrine is that it mistakes impersonality for impartiality.

The idea of public reason has to do with how questions should be decided, but it doesn't tell you what are the good reasons or correct decisions.

We must choose for others as we have reason to believe they would choose for themselves if they were at the age of reason and deciding rationally.