Berkeley had a liberal element in the student body who tended to be quite active. I think that's in general a feature of intellectually active places.

The Intentionality of the mind not only creates the possibility of meaning, but limits its forms.

There are clear cases in which "understanding" literally applies and clear cases in which it does not apply; and these two sorts of cases are all I need for this argument.

Where conscious subjectivity is concerned, there is no distinction between the observation and the thing observed.

How do we get from electrons to elections and from protons to presidents?

The assertion fallacy is the fallacy of confusing the conditions for the performance of the speech act of assertion with the analysis of the meaning of particular words occurring in certain assertions.

Where questions of style and exposition are concerned I try to follow a simple maxim: if you can't say it clearly you don't understand it yourself.