I know of no person or group that is taking nearly adequate advantage of the graphical potentialities of the computer.

In a world in which the price of calculation continues to decrease rapidly, but the price of theorem proving continues to hold steady or increase, elementary economics indicates that we ought to spend a larger and larger fraction of our time on calculation.

Numerical quantities focus on expected values, graphical summaries on unexpected values.

When communicating results to non-technical types there is nothing better than a clear visualization to make your point.

All we know about the world teaches us that the effects of A and B are always different-in some decimal place-for any A and B. Thus asking "are the effects different?" is foolish.

This is my favorite part about analytics: Taking boring flat data and bringing it to life through visualization.

An approximate answer to the right problem is worth a good deal more than an exact answer to an approximate problem.