Far better an approximate answer to the right question, which is often vague, than the exact answer to the wrong question, which can always be made precise.

I know of no person or group that is taking nearly adequate advantage of the graphical potentialities of the computer.

In a world in which the price of calculation continues to decrease rapidly, but the price of theorem proving continues to hold steady or increase, elementary economics indicates that we ought to spend a larger and larger fraction of our time on calculation.

This is my favorite part about analytics: Taking boring flat data and bringing it to life through visualization.

An approximate answer to the right problem is worth a good deal more than an exact answer to an approximate problem.

If we are going to make a mark (key 21), it might as well be a meaningful one.

Visualization is often used for evil - twisting insignificant data changes and making them look meaningful. Don't do that crap if you want to be my friend. Present results clearly and honestly. If something isn't working - those reviewing results need to know.