When liberals clamor for 'diversity,' they don't necessarily mean they are ready to tolerate actual disagreement.

The measure of the state's success is that the word anarchy frightens people, while the word state does not.

It would be a healthy exercise for every politician to look in the mirror every morning and remind himself that he holds office only because, in a two-man race against another mediocrity, a modest majority of those half-informed people who imagined that their votes mattered reckoned that he was the lesser evil. And they weren't too sure about that.

By today's standards King George III was a very mild tyrant indeed. He taxed his American colonists at a rate of only pennies per annum. His actual impact on their personal lives was trivial. He had arbitrary power over them in law and in principle but in fact it was seldom exercised. If you compare his rule with that of today's U.S. Government you have to wonder why we celebrate our independence.

Too many voters are already bought -- not by corporate campaign donors, but by the government itself.

The best argument for anarchism is the twentieth century.

If we need women in our defense forces, we must not need much defense.