As editor of WikiLeaks, I am very proud of three things. Number one, we have never got it wrong in terms of what we say. A document is what it is. Number two, we have never revealed one of our sources ever. Number three, what are we proud of? We are proud that there is not a single instance of anyone coming into physical harm as a result of our publication.

It is impossible to correct abuses unless we know that theyre going on.

If you see the rhetoric from coming out of the Democrats is that they're pro-civil liberties, and an important part of civil liberties is respect for the First Amendment and the rule of law, and that has broken down under the Obama administration, and Hillary Clinton was part of that process.

The aim of Wikileaks is to achieve just reform around the world and do it through the mechanism of transparency.

A lot of people who work for WikiLeaks have the same instinct as me: If you are pushed you push back.

In the history of Wikileaks, nobody has claimed that the material being put out is not authentic.

I'm not a big fan of regulation: anyone who likes freedom of the press can't be.