What is the possible benefit? Can this material save lives? Can it improve the quality of life in Iraq? Can it tend to shape our perceptions of how war should and should not be conducted? Can it shape our perceptions of who should be conducting war and in what manner? And the answer to that is a clear yes.

If we can only live once, let it be a daring adventure.

I found in investigative journalism it is always best, if you have any language skills, not to admit them.

Every time you go to a party and take a picture and post that picture to Facebook, you're being a rat. You're being a narc.

There's more than 1700 emails out of the thirty three thousand Hillary Clinton emails that we've published, just about Libya. It's not that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the removal of [Muammar] Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state - something that she would use in her run-up to the general election for President.

The Clinton camp has been able to project that kind of neo-McCarthy hysteria: that Russia is responsible for everything.

WikiLeaks is a source protection organization. We are famous for never having exposed one of our sources over 10 years. That's why sources trust us and they come to us.