The Second Amendment does protect the right to people to possess weapons for self-defense in the home. That's what the Supreme Court said.

Trust is not what the framers of the United States constitution and of this country relied on.

Even those who, like me, believe that Roe v. Wade and the decisions elaborating on reproductive rights were constitutionally correct must recognize that, for many on the right, the sudden and relatively sloppily reasoned character of the abortion rulings... did real damage to the Court's reputation as a relatively neutral arbiter of legal disputes.

[The Bill of Rights is] designed to protect individuals and minorities against the tyranny of the majority, but it's also designed to protect the people against bureaucracy, against the government.

The only way the avoid a constitution crisis, and I'm not saying we're there yet, is to reassure the public that the person leading the government is someone who has loyalties other than to himself, not loyalties to the foreign governments that helped him financially.

The federal government may not disarm individual citizens without some unusually strong justification.

An excess of law inescapably weakens the rule of law.