I think the archaic idea is actually winner take all, because the principle of "one person, one vote" is a principle that was introduced as a fundamental principle in American law in 1962, long after states had moved to "one person, one vote."

Overregulation corrupts citizens and weakens the rule of law.

When government disappears, its not as if paradise will take its place. When governments are gone, other interests will take their place.

While appropriation art is critical to art, it's an ambiguous art form in the world of the Supreme Court.

I'm focused on solving the problem that would make it plausible for gov't to get back to solving real problems.

Every generation welcomes the pirates from the last.

If there were two candidates, a Democrat and a Republican, who each committed to the same kind of fundamental reform, then the election would be an election between the vice presidential candidates. It'd be just like the regular election, except it would be one step down.