I am primarily a writer of books, and I enjoy that. But I come to realize that a lot of people prefer a visual medium.

Acrid bitterness inevitably seeps into the lives of people who harbor grudges and suppress anger, and bitterness is always a poison. It keeps your pain alive instead of letting you deal with it and get beyond it. Bitterness sentences you to relive the hurt over and over.

There is no way you can harmonize neo-Darwinism and Christianity.

I'm noticing an exciting trend around the country: a resurgence of interest in Christian apologetics (the defense of the faith). This is a reaction to the current attacks on the essentials of Christianity that are coming from militant atheists, radical professors, and Internet gadflies.

I think the Resurrection continues to be a pivotal issue, a pivotal question for people. I think a lot of other issues have been raised in interim years, about the nature of truth, of course gender issues, issues involving social matters like abortion and euthanasia and so forth, those swirl about and change from time to time, but I think the fundamental question of whether or not Christianity is true ultimately goes back to the Resurrection.

I am primarily a writer of books, and I enjoy that. But I come to realize that a lot of people prefer a visual medium.

There are Eastern religions that deny the reality of pain and suffering. They just try to wipe it away by saying it's all an illusion.