It is an hypothesis that the sun will rise tomorrow: and this means that we do not know whether it will rise.

If anyone is unwilling to descend into himself, because this is too painful, he will remain superficial in his writing. . . If I perform to myself, then it’s this that the style expresses. And then the style cannot be my own. If you are unwilling to know what you are, your writing is a form of deceit.

Make sure that your religion is a matter between you and God only.

Every sign by itself seems dead. What gives it life?--In use it is alive. Is life breathed into it there?--Or is the use its life?

One of the most misleading representational techniques in our language is the use of the word 'I.'

Could one imagine a stone's having consciousness? And if anyone can do so-why should that not merely prove that such image-mongery is of no interest to us?

Believers who have formulated such proofs [for God's existence] ... would never have come to believe as a result of such proofs