Like everything metaphysical the harmony between thought and reality is to be found in the grammar of the language.

Elementary propositions consist of names.

I don't know why we are here, but I'm pretty sure that it is not in order to enjoy ourselves.

Concerning that which cannot be talked about, we should not say anything.

If, for example, you were to think more deeply about death, then it would be truly strange if, in so doing, you did not encounter new images.

Is my understanding only blindness to my own lack of understanding? It often seems so to me.

The so-called law of induction cannot possibly be a law of logic, since it is obviously a proposition with a sense.--Nor, therefore, can it be an a priori law.