In philosophy it is always good to put a question instead of an answer to a question. For an answer to the philosophical question may easily be unfair; disposing of it by means of another question is not.

In order to draw a limit to thinking, we should have to think both sides of this limit.

If people did not sometimes do silly things, nothing intelligent would ever get done.

All philosophy is a 'critique of language' (though not in Mauthner's sense). It was Russell who performed the service of showing that the apparent logical form of a proposition need not be its real one.

Where our language suggests a body and there is none: there, we should like to say, is a spirit.

The 2 timeless drivers that underpin the behavior of every generation: the need to belong and the need to be significant. The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.

We learn by rearranging what we know.