This procedure [selecting the simplest law], however, has no logical justification but only a psychological one.

Philosophy limits the thinkable and therefore the unthinkable.

If there were a verb meaning "to believe falsely," it would not have any significant first person, present indicative.

All propositions are of equal value.

Just be indipendent of the external world, so you don't have to fear for what's in it.

My propositions serve as elucidations in the following way: anyone who understands me eventually recognizes them as nonsensical, when he has used them--as steps--to climb up beyond them. (He must, so to speak, throw away the ladder after he has climbed up it.) He must transcend these propositions, and then he will see the whole world aright.

For remember that in general we don't use language according to strict rules-- it hasn't been taught to us by means of strict rules, either. We, in our discussions on the other hand, constantly compare language with a calculus preceding to exact rules.