I'd describe myself as a sexual libertarian - but I'm not a libertine. "To each his own" is my motto.

In an unconstitutional partnership with the state, the church can impose the most irresistible, if covert, controls conceivable.

The agnostic is gutless and prefers to keep one safe foot in the god camp.

I can't pinpoint a period in history or a place in the universe where religion has actually helped the welfare of man.

I feel that everyone has a right to be insane.

Once involved in the school-prayer fight, I rapidly became aware of, and appalled by, the political and economic power of the Church in America -all based on the violation of one of our nation's canon laws: the separation of church and state.

I just can't see either a man or a woman in a dependency position, because from this sort of relationship flows a feeling of superiority on one side and inferiority on the other, and that's a form of slow poison. As I see it, men wouldn't want somebody inferior to them unless they felt inadequate themselves. They're intimidated by a mature woman.