I can no more preach nonviolence to a cowardly man than I can tempt a blind man to enjoy healthy scenes.

In this instance of the fire-arms, the Asiatic has been most improperly bracketed with the native. The British Indian does not need any such restrictions as are imposed by the Bill on the natives regarding the carrying of fire-arms. The prominent race can remain so by preventing the native from arming himself. Is there a slightest vestige of justification for so preventing the British Indian?

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's needs, but not every man's greed.

A perfect Muslim is he from whose tongue and hands mankind is safe.

If Euclid's point, though incapable of being drawn by any human agency, has an imperishable value, my picture has its own for mankind to live.

Truth (satya) is positive, nonviolence is negative.

A man cannot serve God and Mammon, nor be "temperate and furious" at the same time.