From a historical viewpoint, religion is just a kind of superstition, and from a political viewpoint it is a tool of social control.

Whereas science elicits changes in order to know, technology knows in order to elicit changes.

Few if any political philosophers have had the courage of tackling the Cold War. Even the best of them have kept silent or have stated some bromides glossing over the serious shortcomings of "our" side, such as racism, social injustice, extreme income disparities, the exploitation of the Third World, and environmental degradation.

There is a continuum between science and philosophy. As Fichte said (but did not practice), philosophy should be the science of sciences.

Some of the big philosophical problems have been solved by science, at least to a 1st approximation. Examples: the problems of matter, and mind. Only philosophical reactionaries, like Noam Chomsky, claim that they are and will remain mysteries.

Science is morally neutral, but social science shows us that some moral codes are better than others.

Original philosophy is always "deviant" or even subversive.