It is very important to learn to weigh up objectively (or assess intuitively) the totality of the competitive and psychological factors.

As a rule, pawn endings have a forced character, and they can be worked out conclusively.

Training in analysis (like any other form of chess training) should be treated very seriously.

It is not possible to become a great player without having learned how to analyse deeply and accurately.

Emotional instability can be one of the factors giving rise to a failure by chess players in important duels. Under the influence of surging emotions (and not necessarily negative ones) we sometimes lose concentration and stop objectively evaluating the events that are taking place on the board.

Black is now in desperate need of a good idea. Or, to put it standard chess notation, +-

I feel that it is no less interesting to be a trainer than to play oneself. I even take greater delight in the tournament successes of my lads than I do in my own.