Since time itself is not movement, it must somehow have to do with movement.Time is initially encountered in those entities which are changeable, change is in time. How is time exhibited in this way of encountering it, namely, as that within which things change? Does it here give itself as itself in what it is? Can an axplacation of time starts here guarantee that time will thereby provide as it were the fundamental phenomena that determine it in its own being?

We should live totally in the face of the night and of the Evil.

So long as we represent technology as an instrument, we remain held fast in the will to master it.

Time-space as commonly understood, in the sense of the distance measured between two time-points, is the result of time calculation.

Thinking begins only when we have come to know that reason, glorified for centuries, is the stiff-necked adversary of thought.

Time is not a thing, thus nothing which is, and yet it remains constant in its passing away without being something temporal like the beings in time.

he who thinks great thoughts often makes great errors