The true test of any scholar's work is not what his contemporaries say, but what happens to his work in the next 25 or 50 years.

I believe the role that people like myself have played in the transformation of public opinion has been by persistently presenting a different point of view, a point of view which stresses the importance of private markets, of individual freedom, and the distorting effect of governmental policy.

What would the people who sold us goods do with the money? They'd get dollars. What would they do with the dollars? Eat them?!

Complete free trade is not politically feasible. Why? Because it's only in the general interest and in no one's special interest.

Anybody who was easily converted was not worth converting.

Pick at random any three letters from the alphabet, put them in any order, and you will have an acronym designating a federal agency we can do without.

If freedom were not so economically efficient it certainly wouldn't stand a chance.