Anything that strengthens the private sector vs. the state is protective of personal freedom.

The perverse presumption that places the burden of proof on the challenger of spending must be inverted, back to the rule that applies elsewhere in life: 'Prove to me why we should.

I certainly believe in limited government but protecting children against injury abuse is certainly inside my sphere of things that the government should do.

The president's grand experiment in trickle-down government has held back rather than sped economic recovery. He seems to sincerely believe we can build a middle class out of government jobs paid for with borrowed dollars.

We must not falsely teach American history in our schools. We have a law requiring state textbook oversight to guard against frauds like Zinn, and it was encouraging to find that no Hoosier school district had inflicted his book on its students.

[Obama's reelection] would subject the country to what might be a fatal last dose of statism.

Anything that strengthens the private sector vs. the state is protective of personal freedom.