But I don't actually adopt the point of view that our subjective impression of free will, which is a kind of indeterminacy behavior, comes from quantum mechanical indeterminacy.

Think how hard physics would be if particles could think

I would recommend that skeptics devote even more effort than they do now to understanding the reasons why so many people want or need to believe.

You know, there was a time, just before I started to study physical science, when astronomers thought that systems such as we have here in the solar system required a rare triple collision of stars

Just because things get a little dingy at the subatomic level doesn't mean all bets are off.

So the old Copenhagen interpretation needs to be generalized, needs to be replaced by something that can be used for the whole universe, and can be used also in cases where there is plenty of individuality and history

We are driven by the usual insatiable curiosity of the scientist, and our work is a delightful game.