It is not the business of the law to make anyone good or reverent or moral or clean or upright.

The diversity of mankind is a basic postulate of our knowledge of human beings. But if mankind is diverse and individuated, then how can anyone propose equality as an ideal? Every year, scholars hold Conferences on Equality and call for greater equality, and no one challenges the basic tenet. But what justification can equality find in the nature of man? If each individual is unique, how else can he be made 'equal' to others than by destroying most of what is human in him and reducing human society to the mindless uniformity of the ant heap?

The great non sequitur committed by defenders of the State, is to leap from the necessity of society to the necessity of the State.

What...can the government do to help the poor? The only answer is the libertarian answer: Get out of the way.

The ingenious slogan that the public debt does not matter because 'we owe it to ourselves' is clearly absurd.

The libertarian sees the State as a giant gang of organized criminals, who live off the theft called "taxation" and use the proceeds to kill, enslave, and generally push people around. Therefore, any property in the hands of the State is in the hands of thieves, and should be liberated as quickly as possible. Any person or group who liberates such property, who confiscates or appropriates it from the State, is performing a virtuous act and a signal service to the cause of liberty.

Inflation, being a fraudulent invasion of property, could not take place on the free market.