When women are subordinate by their culture, in being able to anticipate or think about pleasurable sex, it boosts dopamine, which is about confidence and assertiveness and motivation and drive and focus. So that to me, explained why for 5,000 years female sexuality has been targeted.

The First Amendment was designed to allow for disruption of business as usual. It is not a quiet and subdued amendment or right.

“Healthy" and “diseased," as Susan Sontag points out...are often subjective judgments that society makes for its own purposes. Women have long been defined as sick as a means of subjecting them to social control.

What are other women really thinking, feeling, experiencing, when they slip away from the gaze and culture of men?

Historically, when a leader has deployed his own military against civilians, it's never been good. There's never been a time where it's ended well.

Is the beauty myth good to men? It hurts them by teaching them how to avoid loving women. It prevents men from actually seeing women. It does not, contrary to its own professed ideology, stimulate and gratify sexual longing. In suggesting a vision in place of a woman, it has a numbing effect, reducing all senses but the visual, and impairing even that.

To live in a culture in which women are routinely naked where men aren't is to learn inequality in little ways all day long.