If anybody says he can think about quantum physics without getting giddy, that only shows he has not understood the first thing about them.

It is the hallmark of any deep truth that its negation is also a deep truth.

If you have a correct statement, then the opposite of a correct statement is of course an incorrect statement, a wrong statement. But when you have a deep truth, then the opposite of a deep truth may again be a deep truth.

Predictions are hard, especially abot the future.

The very nature of the quantum theory ... forces us to regard the space-time coordination and the claim of causality, the union of which characterizes the classical theories, as complementary but exclusive features of the description, symbolizing the idealization of observation and description, respectively.

We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough.

We all know your idea is crazy. The question is whether it is crazy enough.