If you claim to have a theory that deduces unexpected consequences from nontrivial principles, let's see it.

I choose to live in what I think is the greatest country in the world, which is committing horrendous terrorist acts and should stop.

South America has virtually broken away in the last decade. That's an event of historic significance. South America just doesn't follow US orders. In fact there isn't a single US military base left there.

The whole infrastructure of air travel was, and is, part of government policy. It is not a natural development of a free economic system - at least not in the way that is claimed. The same is true of the roads, of course.

I don't like the intellectual label.

Anarcho-syndic alism took for granted that working people ought to control their own work, its conditions, the enterprises in which they work, along with communities, so they should be associated with one another in free associations, and democracy of that kind should be the foundational elements of a more general free society.

If you are not offending people who ought to be offended, you're doing something wrong.