The argument that resistance to the war should remain strictly nonviolent seems to me overwhelming.

The 'anti-globalisation movement' is the most significant proponent of globalisation - but in the interests of people, not concentrations of state-private power.

Governments are not representative. They have their own power, serving segments of the population that are dominant and rich.

Government may not redistribute private wealth or grant special privileges to any individual or group.

The Internet is an élite organization; most of the population of the world has never even made a phone call.

What was the invasion of South Vietnam, for example, in 1962, when Kennedy sent the Air Force to bomb South Vietnam and start chemical warfare? That's aggression.

The internet could be a very positive step towards education, organisation and participation in a meaningful society.