Between two groups of people who want to make inconsistent kinds of worlds, I see no remedy but force.

Nothing is so commonplace has the wish to be remarkable.

Lawyers spend their professional careers shoveling smoke.

The man of action has the present, but the thinker controls the future.

General propositions do not decide concrete cases. The decision will depend on a judgment or intuition more subtle than any articulate major premise.

Our test of truth is a reference to either a present or imagined future majority in favour of our view.

The history of intellectual growth and discovery clearly demonstrates the need for unfettered freedom, the right to think the unthinkable, discuss the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable. To curtail free expression strikes twice at intellectual freedom, for whoever deprives another of the right to state unpopular views necessarily also deprives others of the right to listen to those views.