Results from a given approach are "facts" as long as the approach fits the group or the tradition that is being addressed.

Science is an essentially anarchic enterprise.

In a war a totalitarian state has a free hand.

Without a constant misuse of language there cannot be any discovery, any progress

There is no "scientific worldview" just as there is no uniform enterprise "science" - except in the minds of metaphysicians, school masters, and scientists blinded by the achievements of their own particular niche... There is no objective principle that could direct us away from the supermarket "religion" or the supermarket "art" toward the more modern, and much more expensive supermarket "science." Besides, the search for such guidance would be in conflict with the idea of individual responsibility which allegedly is an important ingredient of a "rational" or scientific age.

I do not see why I should be polite to tyrants, who slobber of humanitarianism and think only of their own petty interests.

First-world science is one science among many; by claiming to be more it ceases to be an instrument of research and turns into a (political) pressure group.