For an answer which cannot be expressed the question too cannot be expressed. The riddle does not exist.

The counterpart of the suicide is the seeker; but the difference between them is slight.

It is difficult to imagine how any behavior in the presence of another person can avoid being a communication of one's own view of the nature of one's relationship with that person and how it can fail to influence that person.

As I have already said, the belief that one's own view of reality is the only reality is the most dangerous or all delusions. It becomes still more dangerous if it is coupled with the missionary zeal to enlighten the rest of the world, whether the rest of the world wishes to be enlightened or not. To refuse to embrace wholeheartedly a particular definition of reality, to dare to see the world differently can become a "think crime" in a truly Orwellian sense as we get steadily closer to 1984.

Radical constructivism, thus, is radical because it breaks with convention and develops a theory of knowledge in which knowledge does not reflect an 'objective' ontological reality.

For an answer which cannot be expressed the question too cannot be expressed. The riddle does not exist.

Usually a person relates to another under the tacit assumption thatthe other shares his view of reality, that indeed there is only onereality.