We are not especially 'interested in' animals. Neither of us had ever been inordinately fond of dogs, cats, or horses in the way that many people are. We didn't 'love' animals.

Whereas the property-owning middle class could win freedom for themselves on the basis of rights to property--thus excluding others from the freedom they gain--the property-less working class possess nothing but their title as human beings. Thus they can liberate themselves only by liberating all humanity.

The Internet, like the steam engine, is a technological breakthrough that changed the world.

Personal purity isn’t really the issue. Not supporting animal abuse – and persuading others not to support it – is.

All the arguments to prove man's superiority cannot shatter this hard fact: in suffering, the animals are our equals.

Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian religious tradition.

Should one break in and free the animals? That is illegal, but the obligation to obey the law is not absolute. It was justifiably broken by those who helped runaway slaves in the American South, to mention only one possible parallel.